Kunal Chattopadhyay takes strong exception (link via Sanhati) to the statement on Nandigram whose signatories include Noam Chomsky, Howard Zinn and … and our own Tariq Ali.
Linked by bhupinder. Join Blogbharti facebook group.
And yes, on 14th November, despite attempts to turn the protest demonstration into an “apolitical” show by some high profile figures, there were banners and posters, like the one that said, Nandigram is Bengal’s Vietnam, or the poster where Marx says, “Not in My name.” Don’t, please, call for a cession of the struggles of toilers in Marx’s name, and don’t claim that bourgeois reformism, like some land distribution, some registration of sharecroppers, or panchayat elections, make West Bengal a planet apart. Stand by those who have been murdered, and their comrades, and don’t call for a reconciliation between defenders of the ruling class who use sophisticated Marxist sounding jargon, and the crude, unsophisticated, but militant fighters who resist them.
For people like Chomsky, Zinn and Ali to be used in what is essentially a CPM media coup carried out by Vijay Prasad, is a shame.


I found another letter on Nandigram, this time by an organisation Sanhati (quoted in the post):
http://sanhati.com/news/141/
Chomsky’s response :
“I?ve heard about it, but from this distance cannot presume to make any judgments with any confidence, though I would certainly support a call for a serious independent investigation.”
I find it disturbing that Chomsky signed the first statement and is cautious about the second. Did he make a judgment with confidence about the first one ? This sounds very unlike the Chomsky I have read.
Also the post on Kafila.