Comments on: CKunte vs NDTV: In the matter of ’shoddy journalism’

By: Critical Stew » NDTV vs Kunte. Some thoughts on law

Critical Stew » NDTV vs Kunte. Some thoughts on law — Fri, 24 Jul 2009 05:50:39 +0000

[...] involved in getting Kunte to apologise (link). But the issue has been picked up by other bloggers (link, link, link, [...]

By: Pranaadhika

Pranaadhika — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:16:21 +0000

I LOVED BARKHA DUTT.
She was my Superwoman, my hero.
Im just shattered that someone with her talent and grit could stoop to this whole “legal withdrawal” business.

I have blogged about it, and my post is directly for her, not NDTV. As fabulous as she is, it took one Prannoy Roy and one Rajdeep Sardesai to make up the Triumvirate of the NDTV Network. They are not involved as per my PERSONAL viewpoint.

This is my post. I would love it if she served me a legal notice as well. I’d be happy to respond.

All the same, this is just a shame for Barkha fans, me included.

http://cuntradiktion.blogspot.com/2009/02/barkha-dutt-this-is-for-you.html

By: NDTV vs Kunte. Some thoughts on law | Subaltern Media

NDTV vs Kunte. Some thoughts on law | Subaltern Media — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:57:39 +0000

[...] involved in getting Kunte to apologise (link). But the issue has been picked up by other bloggers (link, link, link, [...]

By: Vinod Sharma

Vinod Sharma — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 03:15:26 +0000

I have noticed for long that those who shout for freedom the most to shout down others, are just not ready to grant that same freedom to others to shout them down. Sad that things have come to this pass.

By: Mumbai

Mumbai — Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:17:36 +0000

I think it’s fair. If he has really made those statements without any facts or basis, then it is correct on the part of the channel to seek an apology.

After all you cant defame anybody in the name of “Freedom of expression”

By: Trailblazer

Trailblazer — Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:38:03 +0000

[...]In fact, that is what makes this case even more outrageous. To silence a person who is plainly excercising his fundamental right and offering views of what he felt during the time is unconstitutional[...]