<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Follow the Chinese path?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogbharti.com/bombay-addict/india/follow-the-chinese-path/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogbharti.com/bombay-addict/india/follow-the-chinese-path/</link>
	<description>Voices from the Indian Blogosphere</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:14:44 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bhupinder</title>
		<link>http://www.blogbharti.com/bombay-addict/india/follow-the-chinese-path/comment-page-1/#comment-7740</link>
		<dc:creator>bhupinder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogbharti.com/bombay-addict/development/follow-the-chinese-path/#comment-7740</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the extract, Gaddeswarup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the extract, Gaddeswarup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bombay Addict</title>
		<link>http://www.blogbharti.com/bombay-addict/india/follow-the-chinese-path/comment-page-1/#comment-7739</link>
		<dc:creator>Bombay Addict</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogbharti.com/bombay-addict/development/follow-the-chinese-path/#comment-7739</guid>
		<description>Gaddeswarup - thanks very much for that useful piece of info. Who&#039;d hve thought that anyone would say that urbanisation does not affect the rate of economic growth!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gaddeswarup &#8211; thanks very much for that useful piece of info. Who&#8217;d hve thought that anyone would say that urbanisation does not affect the rate of economic growth!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gaddeswarup</title>
		<link>http://www.blogbharti.com/bombay-addict/india/follow-the-chinese-path/comment-page-1/#comment-7737</link>
		<dc:creator>gaddeswarup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 07:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogbharti.com/bombay-addict/development/follow-the-chinese-path/#comment-7737</guid>
		<description>There is a special issue of Science Magazine on urbanization dated feb. 8, 2008. Unfortunately the articles need suscription. Here is the abstract of one of the survey articles.

Urbanization and the Wealth of Nations

David E. Bloom,* David Canning, Günther Fink 

The proportion of a country&#039;s population living in urban areas is highly correlated with its level of income. Urban areas offer economies of scale and richer market structures, and there is strong evidence that workers in urban areas are individually more productive, and earn more, than rural workers. However, rapid urbanization is also associated with crowding, environmental degradation, and other impediments to productivity. Overall, we find no evidence that the level of urbanization affects the rate of economic growth. Our findings weaken the rationale for either encouraging or discouraging urbanization as part of a strategy for economic growth. 

Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, 665 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA. 


* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dbloom@hsph.harvard.edu</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a special issue of Science Magazine on urbanization dated feb. 8, 2008. Unfortunately the articles need suscription. Here is the abstract of one of the survey articles.</p>
<p>Urbanization and the Wealth of Nations</p>
<p>David E. Bloom,* David Canning, Günther Fink </p>
<p>The proportion of a country&#8217;s population living in urban areas is highly correlated with its level of income. Urban areas offer economies of scale and richer market structures, and there is strong evidence that workers in urban areas are individually more productive, and earn more, than rural workers. However, rapid urbanization is also associated with crowding, environmental degradation, and other impediments to productivity. Overall, we find no evidence that the level of urbanization affects the rate of economic growth. Our findings weaken the rationale for either encouraging or discouraging urbanization as part of a strategy for economic growth. </p>
<p>Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, 665 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA. </p>
<p>* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: <a href="mailto:dbloom@hsph.harvard.edu">dbloom@hsph.harvard.edu</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
