Dr Arvind Sharma citing a couple of anecdotes enounces that Ramayana is morally rigid while Mahabharata is morally convenient. The convergence he sees in the propounding of Dharma
Should it be that one taking a vow could break it, that there is nothing such as personal and social morality? Is the entire common-life moral structure that contingent? If so, it would not be possible to carry on our everyday life, for this would destroy the mutual confidence people have regarding promise-keeping.
The answer is provided in the incident involving Arjuna and Yudhishtira
Linked by BVN. Join Blogbharti facebook group.
the malaysian rindians regards as hy need 10,000 sitha wamn for the malays as they are regarded as they may turn to ravana. NAyhow they does regards as raayaa areresrevd preserve dfor malay needs guidances. They does regards as non hindus wll be ravana while indians man regards as ramar. Anyhow they find less i find any solutio due it wll be as hindu as well indians problem as wll hey never like hinduism at all. Anyhow tey are all high class agtserism. I wnet to divine life society which they regulr ask me to com for classe sover a book to be sold at Rm 10.00 The old man who look malay does regards as other indians look like malay which regard as enjoying such spirtual enviroment in divine life house. very bad people which they does regards as malaysan projec which chinese indians.