Non-Brahmin Hindu is an angry person:
Linked by kuffir. Join Blogbharti facebook group.I’m sure that Upper Castes Controlled Indian State Will Never Allow Developments of Non-Upper Castes Indians at Any Cost Come What May, India Can Become a Big Market & Economy Only When Original Indians Will Develop & As Long as Upper Castes Controls Indian States It’s Impossible. Original Indians Want to Develop, they Are Very Development Oriented But Upper Castes Can Never Allow B/c they (Upper Castes) Feel they Won’t be Able to Sit On the Heads of Original Indians, Like Now !
Hi,
It does not do blogbharti to link to rants such as these. What this blog is saying can effectively be summarized as slander. The article is no different from the various RSS ones that we see on the net. Just because it is anti-upper-caste-Hindu does not make it good. It is immature and useless.
Vinod.
vinod,
thanks for the comment. i agree with you that the original post can be interpreted as a rant. but i’d like to know what specifically are you objecting to- is it the tone and the language or is it the message and the content?
I agree with Vinod. Much as I sympathize with the passionate writer of the article, for a blog-aggregate site such as this, I think you guys can do much better.
I read through the entire article, and from a neutral non-Hindu point of view, the first impression I got from the article is the extreme hatred tone used against… you know who. Such an article is no different from those RSS propaganda, or christianaggression.com articles, or pro-Christian fundamentalist articles etc, unless you guys are trying to rake up a controversial discussion regarding it here.
Every passage in that post always lead back to the same old deep utter hatred for the Brahmins. There are tons and tons of blogs like that in the blogosphere, all using “such tones” about this community and that community… you should ask yourself, are those the quality of posts you want to “advertise” at this great site?
Warm regards,
Kima.
I think it was the tone and the language. It was so irrational and propagandist! I don’t necessarily agree with the content but that is another issue. I would always have people express their opinion no matter what. But it was the tone that really put me off.
eh.. what happened to my comment :(
kima,
but i can see your comment. did you post one earlier too?
Yes :( I posted a long one, agreeing with the lines of Vinod… :(
It was even posted, and then I went out to buy rice (lolz) and I came back and… no more comment :(
kima,
your earlier comment was marked as spam by the spam blocker (akismet). i checked and approved it.. doesn’t happen normally.
vinod/kima,
i agree with both of you that the tone of the post might be viewed as harsh. but here’s something i’ve learnt through a few years of blog-reading: i’ve read too many blogs expressing the opposite point of view in much harsher tones. and those which were more civil were actually much more hurtful. if there was a scale for measuring these things- it’d be tip absurdly to one side.
what might appear to some as propagandist might not appear so to others. like, for instance, this blogger refers to control of the indian state. there’s enough factual evidence to suggest that what he says is not unfounded. but as you said, his (or her) tone is harsh. but experience tells me - we shouldn’t expect the underdog to express themselves in the same tone as others.
but, your point is taken.